Canadian
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 189
- Location
- Alberta, Canada
Hi all,
I just read a post in TGO where I was corrected in that there are no cowboys in Australia, there are cattlemen. Well, as an Albertan I note that cattlemen usually refer to men who own land and significant amounts of cattle bred for industrial slaughter (ie not free range, rather fed in feedlots).
This got me thinking, what kind of terms do we use to display different affectations for members of working classes. For example, the term cowboy, ranch hand, rancher and cattleman all mean different things. My BIL is a cowboy (lives on and owns a small hobby farm up north, owns about 4 horses, chickens and occasionally the odd goat. No cows). He is as entitled to wear his Stetsons just as any cowboy down south who might work with actual cows. In fact, to suggest any term other than cowboy to describe him, might be derogatory. His primary occupation is with the oilfields as a consultant.
Ranch hand is something totally different from cowboy. That implies you're working on a real ranch with horses. It says nothing about if you own or work with cows, but then again, the term cowboy means nothing about if you own or work with cows. It implies you live on the ranch, in quarters or a trailer/tent or something. It also implies you are on professional standing with other ranch hands (like car mechanics, you are seen as having skills, but they may be specific to your location or makeup of your employer.). Just like a car mechanic, some ranch hands are like BMW mechanics and others are lawnmower repairmen. But a ranch hand is seen as having special skills native to his job and location.
Ranchers and cattlemen are something altogether different. A ranch is basically a spread of property in a rural area. Ranches are not grain-producing farms. They produce either free range or feedlot animals for slaughter for the general market. A cattleman is the same way, although a cattleman may merely own cattle and pay to have them fed and slaughtered and resold. The title rancher or cattleman implies a standing in the upper classes. The two are virtually synonymous but there are regional variants. Around my parts, there are more intensive livestock operations (feedlots) owned by cattle companies (corporate cattlemen), while an hour away in the desert, we have ranches.
Just some thoughts. Feel free to debate.
I just read a post in TGO where I was corrected in that there are no cowboys in Australia, there are cattlemen. Well, as an Albertan I note that cattlemen usually refer to men who own land and significant amounts of cattle bred for industrial slaughter (ie not free range, rather fed in feedlots).
This got me thinking, what kind of terms do we use to display different affectations for members of working classes. For example, the term cowboy, ranch hand, rancher and cattleman all mean different things. My BIL is a cowboy (lives on and owns a small hobby farm up north, owns about 4 horses, chickens and occasionally the odd goat. No cows). He is as entitled to wear his Stetsons just as any cowboy down south who might work with actual cows. In fact, to suggest any term other than cowboy to describe him, might be derogatory. His primary occupation is with the oilfields as a consultant.
Ranch hand is something totally different from cowboy. That implies you're working on a real ranch with horses. It says nothing about if you own or work with cows, but then again, the term cowboy means nothing about if you own or work with cows. It implies you live on the ranch, in quarters or a trailer/tent or something. It also implies you are on professional standing with other ranch hands (like car mechanics, you are seen as having skills, but they may be specific to your location or makeup of your employer.). Just like a car mechanic, some ranch hands are like BMW mechanics and others are lawnmower repairmen. But a ranch hand is seen as having special skills native to his job and location.
Ranchers and cattlemen are something altogether different. A ranch is basically a spread of property in a rural area. Ranches are not grain-producing farms. They produce either free range or feedlot animals for slaughter for the general market. A cattleman is the same way, although a cattleman may merely own cattle and pay to have them fed and slaughtered and resold. The title rancher or cattleman implies a standing in the upper classes. The two are virtually synonymous but there are regional variants. Around my parts, there are more intensive livestock operations (feedlots) owned by cattle companies (corporate cattlemen), while an hour away in the desert, we have ranches.
Just some thoughts. Feel free to debate.