Blackjack
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,198
- Location
- Crystal Lake, Il
A back lot shot from either Frankenstein (1931) OR SON OF FRANKENSTEIN (1939) judging by the clothes...any ideas????
Blackjack said:Right you are Mike! The lace up pants are one of the giveaways. That and the scar and clamps on the head in which there are several (in the original you only saw one) Very observant Mike, you win the HALLOWEEN PRIZE.:eusa_clap
This pic has been circulating around the web supposedly part of an auction by Sara Karloff, the word is that the "humans" in the picture were visiting relatives from England.
mike said:First off, GREAT SHOT! Where'd you find it!?
I could be mistaken, but a few issues here...
Prior to the '31 Frankenstein, Karloff was a starving actor. It was easy for James Whale to pick him out of a commissary lunch table because he already resembled a corpse! But afterward he was well fed and livin' the life. And you can see it plain as day in his face. By the time of Bride of Frankenstein he looked so healthy that Jack Pierce had to try to hide it so it didn't seem too jarring a difference from film to film. In Son of Frankenstein several years later, this issue of being well fed, healthy and successful was only more of an issue.
Also another big difference from the '31, '35, '39 films is the make up. In the first film, the head piece was built up with cotton and make up while subsequent films Jack Piece had a prosthetic piece made so less time had to be spent in the make up chair (or maybe it was first used in Son of come to think of it... my Frankenstein info is a bit rusty.) Regardless, you're looking at that headpiece in this picture!
And finally, in my mind the dead giveaway (pun intended!) are those lace up pants were strictly used in the '39 film!