i do, but i find it very confusingly described and illustrated. the whole thing could have been made much simpler to follow.
i also don't follow the book's methods to the letter by any means, but use it as something to take the bits i like from.
i don't bother with the top welt / jet when...
^ that's my understanding too; the type of stand-less collar seen on US gabardine leisure shirts.
the shirt above appears to have no top button so maybe that's what's 'convertible' about it ?
whacky proportions. notice that if you fastened the jacket you wouldn't see any of the waistcoat. the three buttons couldn't really get much closer.
Harold Lloyd's early 20s suits , although similar in proportion, have less extreme button stance:
cpdv, i've handled a couple of Victorian ones similar to those below, but don't own any. i'm guessing it's the late teens - early 20s ones you're interested in ?
they go all the way back to the Regency period frock coat.
agreed. i see nothing suspect about the label (or lining) at all.
put it on ebay with some good clear photos and mention Burberrys and 1936 in the title, and you should get a very good price for it.
me too, as i like a sweater to be an inch or two over the trouser waistband.
makes me wonder why they made such long sweaters in the first place when trousers were higher waisted.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.